The Philadelphia Eagles are pretty much gone over the cliff. They are staring at a bona fide season-threatening crisis. Four consecutive losses have dragged them to 2-4. Their offense has lost its identity. Now, Jalen Hurts' blood-clot diagnosis has thrown the franchise's immediate future into limbo. The team has chosen not to announce a specific return date yet. However, Hurts is reportedly expected to miss the remainder of the season. That forces general manager Howie Roseman to consider a difficult question: Should the Eagles sell before the trade deadline? A complete teardown would be premature. That said, moving selected veterans for future assets could make sense if the losses continue.
Season slipping away
The Eagles opened 2026 with narrow victories over Washington and Tennessee, but their early momentum has disappeared. Blowout losses to Chicago and Carolina, a late collapse against the Rams, and a defeat against Jacksonville have exposed a struggling offense. Against Carolina, Philadelphia managed just 35 rushing yards while backup quarterback Tanner McKee attempted to carry an offense missing its franchise leader. The Panthers won 25-14, dropping the Eagles to 2-4. Hurts' placement on injured reserve only deepens the uncertainty. With his absence, Philadelphia must prepare for the possibility that its quarterback will miss an extended stretch.
Trade Dallas Goedert
Goedert remains a productive, versatile tight end. Still, his situation deserves consideration if Philadelphia chooses to sell. He signed a one-year, $7 million contract in March. That makes him a potentially attractive short-term acquisition for any contender. Through four appearances this season, he has recorded 17 receptions for 180 yards and two touchdowns. Those numbers make him a valuable asset whose contract situation could appeal to teams pursuing a postseason run.
A contender needing a reliable middle-of-the-field target could offer Philadelphia a Day 2 pick or a conditional mid-round selection. Of course, that will depend on demand and contract considerations. Roseman should not give Goedert away cheaply, especially given his blocking ability and familiarity with the offense.
The argument for moving him is about timing, not talent. Goedert is on a short-term deal. Philadelphia could lose him without compensation if the sides part ways after the season. If the Eagles fall further out of contention, converting his value into draft capital would be sensible.
Move Marquise Brown
Brown offers a different trade proposition. Philadelphia signed the veteran receiver to a one-year contract worth up to $6.5 million. They had hoped his speed would add another dimension to the passing game. However, an ankle injury has limited his availability. That has complicated his opportunity to establish a role alongside DeVonta Smith and the team's other receiving options.
A contender looking for a vertical threat could have interest in Brown. That's particularly true if he demonstrates that he is healthy enough to contribute. Philadelphia should explore whether a late-round pick or a conditional selection is attainable. Even modest compensation would be preferable to losing a short-term signing without receiving anything in return.
Now, the Eagles should be realistic. Brown's injury and limited production weaken his market value. No team will surrender premium draft capital based on speed alone. Roseman should listen to offers. That said, trading Brown only makes sense if the compensation outweighs the benefit of retaining him as insurance for an offense already short on reliable options.
Deal Marcus Epps
Epps is another veteran whose contract situation could make him available. Philadelphia signed him to a one-year deal after bringing him back to strengthen the safety room. His experience and communication skills could appeal to a contender seeking dependable secondary depth. That is particularly true if injuries have depleted its defensive backfield.
The Eagles, meanwhile, could use the remaining weeks to evaluate their younger defensive backs. They can determine which players belong in their long-term plans. A late-round pick would not transform the franchise. However, accumulating additional selections matters if Roseman anticipates a more extensive roster overhaul next offseason.
Article Continues BelowEpps should not be moved simply because he is a veteran. Philadelphia must weigh the value of his experience against the potential return, especially while the defense is navigating its own injuries. If another team offers meaningful compensation, however, Roseman should consider it.
Strategy, not desperation
Philadelphia's situation is grim. However, a fire sale should not become an emotional reaction to four straight defeats. Hurts' health remains the priority. His absence has not officially been declared season-long. The Eagles still have talented players capable of helping them recover if the offense stabilizes.
Goedert is the strongest trade candidate because of his production and short-term contract. Brown is a conditional option if a contender values his speed. At the same time, Epps could provide a modest draft return. Roseman should explore all three possibilities without accepting bad deals merely to signal a change in direction.
The Eagles need clarity, not panic. If the season continues to unravel, turning expiring veteran value into future assets would be smart roster management. Philadelphia's next move must not be guided by the temptation to tear everything down overnight.