In the course of the Arizona Cardinals’ Week 13 assembly with the Minnesota Vikings, a choice to kick a subject aim as an alternative of going for it on fourth down would possibly’ve been a game-losing selection by Jonathan Gannon. Earlier than kicking the sector aim, analyst and former Professional Bowl tight finish Greg Olsen defined why the Cardinals ought to’ve gone for it.
“I’d think about going [for the fourth-down conversion], Olsen mentioned earlier than the Cardinals lined up for a 23-yard subject aim to increase their result in six factors. “Being up six [points], Minnesota has to say, ‘Okay, it is landing or bust.’ They are going for fourth downs, they’re placing the pedal to the metallic to go all the way down to beat you. Even when you failed right here going for it on fourth down making an attempt to make it 10, you stay solely up three. [The Vikings] are just a little extra cautious. They’re saying, ‘I’ve a subject aim in my again pocket to tie the sport,’ so that is an fascinating determination.”
The Cardinals confronted a fourth-and-goal from the five-yard line with a three-point lead. Kicker Chad Ryland nailed the chipshot subject aim, making the rating 22-16 with just below three-and-a-half minutes remaining. So, the Cardinals basically made a one-score sport a one-score sport with their fourth-quarter subject aim. As a substitute of needing a subject aim to tie this sport, the Vikings would now want a landing and an additional level to win.
Greg Olsen’s 4th-down philosophy reigns supreme in Cardinals loss vs. Vikings
In a sport the place the Cardinals out-gained the Vikings by practically 150 yards, their end-of-game decision-making is perhaps why their report is 6-6 moderately than 7-5.
Had the Cardinals adopted Olsen’s philosophy concerning the choice to aim a fourth-down conversion with three minutes left, there’s an opportunity the Cardinals aren’t discovering a solution to bounce again after a Week 13 loss.
The reasoning behind desirous to go for it on fourth down on this occasion is comparatively easy.
Associated Arizona Cardinals InformationArticle continues beneath
For the sake of this argument, as an instance the Cardinals tried the fourth-down conversion and weren’t profitable. As a substitute of the Vikings figuring out their solely means of staying alive is a landing to win, they’re now teaching underneath the concept that a subject aim sends this sport to additional time.
As a substitute of teaching for a landing or a subject aim, the Cardinals’ option to kick a subject aim compelled the Vikings to solely care about scoring a game-winning subject aim.
Now, had the Cardinals gone for the fourth down and efficiently transformed, they’d maintain a 10-point lead, requiring no less than two scores from the Vikings to be overwhelmed or despatched to additional time.
This is not a case of hindsight being 20-20, both. Olsen was saying this earlier than the Cardinals even tried the kick. And contemplating the outcomes of this sport, Olsen seems to have been appropriate.