England captain Jos Buttler expressed his dissatisfaction with India’s determination to introduce Harshit Rana as a concussion substitute for Shivam Dube through the fourth T20I match in Pune, which the hosts gained the match by 15 runs, securing an unassailable 3-1 lead within the sequence.
Dube, who performed a vital knock of 53 runs off 34 balls, was struck on the helmet by a Jamie Overton‘s supply within the remaining over of India’s innings. After being assessed by medical employees and subsequently not taking the sphere for England’s chase, Rana was introduced in as a concussion substitute. Rana made a right away affect, claiming 3 wickets for 33 runs and enjoying a decisive function in India’s victory.
Jos Buttler criticizes ‘like-for-like’ substitution
Throughout the post-match press convention, Buttler strongly disagreed with the substitution, questioning its adherence to the Worldwide Cricket Council (ICC) guidelines for concussion replacements.
“Both Shivam Dube has placed on about 25 mph with the ball or Harshit has actually improved his batting. It’s not a like-for-like alternative, we don’t agree with that. It’s a part of the sport; I nonetheless assume we should always have gone on to win the match however we disagree with the choice,” Buttler said.
Notably, the ICC’s concussion substitute tips stipulate that the alternative participant needs to be a like-for-like substitute who doesn’t present the workforce with an undue benefit. Nevertheless, match referee Javagal Srinath accredited India’s request for Rana as Dube’s alternative, resulting in the controversy.
Additionally READ: Triple-wicket maiden: England pacer Saqib Mahmood achieves a novel feat within the 4th T20I towards India
Lack of session fuels frustration
Buttler additionally highlighted the shortage of communication between the officers and England’s workforce administration concerning the choice, emphasizing that such a vital ruling ought to have been mentioned with each groups beforehand. He expressed his disappointment over being knowledgeable concerning the substitution solely after it had already been accredited and applied, leaving England with no alternative to lift objections or search clarification in actual time.
“There was no session. As I got here out to bat, I requested the umpire why Harshit was on the sphere, and he mentioned he’s the concussion sub, which I used to be fairly confused by,” Buttler remarked.
The incident has triggered a debate over the interpretation of the concussion substitute rule. Former England cricketers, together with Kevin Pietersen and Alastair Prepare dinner, have additionally questioned the choice, emphasizing the disparity between Dube, a batting all-rounder, and Rana, a specialist quick bowler with restricted batting capability in T20 cricket.
India defend the choice
India’s bowling coach, Morne Morkel, defended the workforce’s transfer, asserting that the choice was made solely based mostly on Dube’s well being considerations. He additionally said that it was in the end as much as the match referee to approve the substitution.
With the controversy gaining momentum, discussions surrounding the concussion substitute rule and its implementation are more likely to proceed, including one other layer of intrigue to the continuing sequence.