Actual Madrid secured a useful win within the first leg of their Champions League Spherical of 16 derby conflict with Atletico Madrid, courtesy of a second of brilliance from Brahim Diaz early within the second half. Nonetheless Los Colchoneros imagine that the winner shouldn’t have stood.
Brahim floored Jose Maria Gimenez within the field with fast ft earlier than discovering the far nook of the web in maybe his finest second for Actual Madrid in his profession. Nonetheless there’s a rising sentiment from Atletico Madrid followers that Vinicius Junior was offside within the build-up, and obscured Jan Oblak’s view of the shot from an offside place. Related incidents have seen objectives disallowed for interfering with play.
Brahim Díaz places on his dancing footwear and slots it into the nook for Actual Madrid 🤌 pic.twitter.com/HRq1ANfq5t
— CBS Sports activities Golazo ⚽️ (@CBSSportsGolazo) March 4, 2025
Actual Madrid take the lead towards the run of play 📈
Good footwork from Brahim Díaz opens up the angle for a superb curling effort 👏
📺 @tntsports & @discoveryplusUK pic.twitter.com/aDCdVLeaDe
— Soccer on TNT Sports activities (@footballontnt) March 4, 2025
It’s a resolution that provoked specific ire from the Rojiblanco help when put next with a beforehand disallowed purpose for Atletico within the derby. As just lately as final 12 months, Stefan Savic noticed a header chalked off because of the place of Saul Niguez in entrance of Andriy Lunin.
Vinicius seems to be blocking Oblak’s view proper earlier than Brahim’s purpose. Final season, Atleti’s purpose towards Madrid obtained disallowed for a similar motion. pic.twitter.com/5YjZQByZlK
— Atletico Universe (@atletiuniverse) March 5, 2025
Former referee Eduardo Iturralde Gonzalez advised Cadena SER (by way of Relevo) that for him a minimum of, it was a authorized purpose.
“Vinicius goes the place the ball just isn’t going, he’s going out of the play. In life there may be interference like that. Yet one more body, and also you see that Oblak sees the ball come off his boot.”
But RadioMarca’s refereeing skilled Pavel Fernandez disagreed with Iturralde, maybe suggesting that the matter was much less clear.
“There was a positional offside in Brahim’s purpose. It’s positional, however Vinicius is offside within the capturing line and a metre and a half from Oblak. The Atleti goalkeeper can’t see the shot as a result of the Brazilian is in entrance of him. I’ve little question. It’s not the referee’s fault, the issue is that they don’t warn him from the VAR.”
In the end, in accordance with the rulebook, the VAR and referee Clement Turpin needed to make a judgement on whether or not Oblak’s imaginative and prescient of the shot was obstructed. The Slovenian actually didn’t attraction after the incident, however neither does that imply VAR confirmed not have intervened.
“A participant who’s in an offside place when the ball touches or is performed by a team-mate will solely be penalised if he actively participates in play in one of many following methods: Interfering with play, by enjoying or touching a ball handed to or touched by a team-mate; in addition to interfering with an opponent’s play in one of many following 3 ways.” A type of methods is stopping the defending participant from “enjoying or having the ability to play the ball, by clearly obstructing the opponent’s visual field.”